Launch support vs guided/manual
Supported ATS Matrix
Direct answer
RoleWorth treats ATS support as a verified capability, not a slogan. Public posting capture and scoring can work on supported hosts; submission-adjacent actions remain guided or manual-required until fixture proof and review gates exist.
Live scan result
● Launch matrixSubmit · Autofill · Detect
Updated May 11
ATS HostDetectAutofillScoreSubmit
Greenhouse✓✓✓✓ Submit
Lever✓✓✓✓ Submit
Ashby✓✓✓✓ Submit
Workable✓✓✓Guided
Workday✓✓✓Manual
LinkedIn✓✓✓Manual
Indeed✓✓✓Guided
Custom forms✓✓✓Guided
Manual / guided rows = capture + score only · submit waits for your approval
Decision table
When this is the right tool — and when it isn't.
3 verdicts · honest cuts
01 · Pursue
Choose RoleWorth if
- You want honest ATS support labels.
- You want capture and scoring even where submit is unsupported.
- You want audit records for blocked/manual/failed/submitted outcomes.
02 · Maybe
Choose another tool if
- You need a tool that claims broader form support and can tolerate more breakage.
03 · Skip
Choose neither if
- You only apply by email or recruiter referral.
Hidden cost
Universal ATS claims sound convenient until the form is account-gated or captcha-protected.
The wrong jobs don't just waste applications. They drain interview prep, recruiter outreach, and momentum.
| RoleWorth focus | Real-job signals, worth score, proof package, review gates, and manual-required boundaries. |
|---|---|
| Typical tool focus | Resume formatting, keyword match, tracker rows, generic autofill, or raw volume. |
| Public guardrail | Risk flags are evidence signals, not guarantees. Unsupported submit flows stop at manual review. |
Sources · Last updated May 13, 2026
Decision-first
Supported ATS Matrix — without spraying applications at jobs that were never going to interview you.