Launch support vs guided/manual
Supported ATS Matrix
Direct answer
RoleWorth treats Greenhouse, Lever, and Ashby as launch-grade submit targets. Workable, Workday, LinkedIn, Indeed, and custom company forms are captured and scored, but submit remains guided or manual-required until fixture proof exists.
Manual / guided rows = capture + score only · submit waits for fixture proof
Decision table
When this is the right tool — and when it isn't.
Choose RoleWorth if
- You want honest ATS support labels.
- You want capture and scoring even where submit is unsupported.
- You want audit records for blocked/manual/failed/submitted outcomes.
Choose another tool if
- You need a tool that claims broader form support and can tolerate more breakage.
Choose neither if
- You only apply by email or recruiter referral.
Product proof
See the product surface behind the claim.
Each page carries the matching RoleWorth surface in a glass-framed proof card: the radar, extension overlay, ATS matrix, review queue, dashboard, or package flow behind the promise.
Launch-grade support is labeled honestly: Greenhouse, Lever, and Ashby submit; LinkedIn and Workday stop at manual review.
The extension proof: score the posting where the user browses, then build a package or send it to review.
Hidden cost
Universal ATS claims sound convenient until the form is account-gated or captcha-protected.
The wrong jobs don't just waste applications. They drain interview prep, recruiter outreach, and momentum.
| RoleWorth focus | Real-job signals, worth score, proof package, review queue, approved submit on Greenhouse · Lever · Ashby. |
|---|---|
| Typical tool focus | Resume formatting, keyword match, tracker rows, generic autofill, or raw volume. |
| Public guardrail | Risk flags are evidence signals, not guarantees. Unsupported submit flows stop at manual review. |
Sources · Last updated May 13, 2026
Decision-first
Supported ATS Matrix — without spraying applications at jobs that were never going to interview you.